近日，多位结石患者向美国石度康大陆服务中心反应两篇题为《美国石度康是保健品吗?是骗局吗?【315记者揭秘】》和《美国石度康效果怎么样?是保健品吗?【记者真假揭秘曝光】》的文章，内容完全一样，文中给出了所谓的美国石度康官网链接，标注了产品图片，但信息全部是错误的。美国石度康大陆服务中心对此高度重视，根据患者的说法找到了这两篇文章，对其中的诸多错误与漏洞在此向社会予以揭露。
希望发文者能够意识到“以虚假内容误导结石患者，严重破坏了双版美国石度康品牌形象，试图欺诈钱财的行为已构成违法犯罪事实”，美国石度康大陆服务中心对此保留向法院、工商等国家机关提起追究并获得经济赔偿的的权利。同时，提醒广大的结石患者在购买双版美国石度康胶囊，自然恢复胆结石或泌尿结石及其并发症的过程中能够认清真正的美国石度康大陆地区*官网http://www.stoneclean.cn/；与*客服热线400-692-5399。
首先，上边所提到的两篇文章所给出的官网链接是错误的。工作人员在调查过程中点击官网链接见到如下画面，被提示“您要访问的网站被大量用户举报，存在虚假信息，网站通过虚假的信息诱骗您的进行交易，或诱骗您的电话号码、身份证号码等个人信息，已为您拦截”。
其次，这两篇文章在文中所展示的产品图片是美国司杜芬（Stone Defense）,而不是双版美国石度康胆结石版（Stone Clean）与泌尿结石版（Stone Clean UT），企图误导结石患者。
再次，对于双版美国石度康的成分描述是完全错误的，美国石度康胆结石版（Stone Clean）与泌尿结石版（Stone Clean UT）的成分是完全不同的，文中却不做任何分类只说石度康，丝毫不提两个版本之间的不同，某些成分更是错到离谱。
双版美国石度康是世界著名的草药供应商美国健康治愈公司针对胆结石、泌尿结石及其并发症研发的，原装进口至中国大陆地区。双版美国石度康帮助数以百万计的结石患者回归健康生活，口碑载道，被多家知名媒体与权威机构争相报道为“顽固结石康复的*选择”、“消除顽固结石的*之道”、“打破结石复发魔咒的天使之心”等。
对于315的问题，记者通过多方调查发现，很多网站上所谓的“315认证”“315记者揭秘”“315调研”等标题都存在很大的欺诈性。每年的3月15日是“国际消费者权益日” (World Consumer Rights Day) ，由国际消费者联盟组织于1983年确定，目的在于扩大消费者权益保护的宣传，使之在世界范围内得到重视，以促进各国和地区消费者组织之间的合作与交往，在国际范围内更好地保护消费者权益。可以看出来，消费者保护协会从世界到国家，再到地方都有这样的组织，那所谓的“315认证”是谁认证的呢？世界？国家？地方？还是个人？其真假不言而喻。曾经早就有报道披露过，有些个人或者组织制造虚假舆论，误导大众选择，建设带有误导性质的315查询、认证等网站，向相关企业索要高额费用，但很多市民对此缺乏必要的了解。
*，衷心的感谢双版美国石度康的支持者，希望所有的结石患者都能早日消除结石，回归健康生活！
These papers essay an understanding of some of the various principles which underlie the course of political movements in the present age. There is no attempt at introducing any considerations which are not familiar to every intelligent person, nor any comparisons with other instances which are not already well known in history. Why considerations which seem so obvious when stated, should yet not be familiar, may perhaps be due to the estrangement between science and corporate life, which is an unhappy feature of a time of transition both in education and in motives.
The point of view here is that of public and general conditions and not of private variations of beliefs. Such moral factors, though all important to the individual, are not so much the subject of the direct physical causes and effects which are here considered. Similarly the beneficial result of private benevolence is not added to these considerations, because it is largely outside of the effects of conduct, and finds its good in amending or the evil consequences of various actions. It will have its scope, but in opposition to, rather than in concert with, the direct effects which we are here to consider.
Too often the objections to various new views are based upon some sentiment of one party, rather than upon the reason which is common to all parties. Here, on the contrary, the aim is to consider the natural consequences of various actions, apart from personal opinion, and therefore on a common ground which all readers can equally accept.
来源：https://www.cddnw.com